JDI Results
Project Development and Management
The success of technical efforts and field
erection activities is
highly dependent on the planning and care taken
during project
development. The JDI project development and management
approach clearly
identifies desired project outcomes and delivers
results though a concrete
process of review, input, and organization.
Our experience working
with teams at all levels of plant operations and
management creates a
constructive, learning environment for your team to
deliver high performance
results.
Engineering and Technical
Effective leadership, clear communications, and
well defined goals and
objectives are keys to your technical team
success. Our modeling
approach, work definition procedures, and
experienced support staff
will help your team organize, analyze, and
deliver.
Using
new methods and
technology, we can guide and strengthen your
team.
An
Integrated Example
In a series of studies commissioned by Emerson
Process Management, the
JDI Contracts approach was applied to a several
power applications with
promising results.
On
a 600 MW Greenfield
supercritical plant installation, it was estimated
$20 million could be saved
on a total project cost of over $800 million.
Substantial control cable
and associated infrastructure can be
eliminated from the
project scope. Many hard field terminations were
eliminated while gaining
access to additional data and control points.
Savings were identified in
every area evaluated, including system
selection, engineering,
construction, overheads, and startup. For DCS
costs evaluated in the
study, a 35% reduction was identified.
The
project approach is key to
delivering these savings. The environment for
change, such as a bused
plant, starts with development, is implemented
by project management, and
delivered by technical resources who build
new technology into the
plant and find improvements and results.
For
a Greenfield or retrofit
wet FGD scrubber project on a 660 MW unit,
similar savings exist. A
larger reduction in hard field terminations,
cable and support
infrastructure was found due to the highly discrete
nature of scrubber control
system projects. In addition to schedule
savings, total savings
were estimated at $3.9 million on total project
budget of $82.5 million.
In
every case, engineering
time was reduced. Cable, conduit, tray, and
labor required for
installation were reduced. Implementation standards
were rigidly followed to
maintain plant security, reliability, and
intrinsic safety at levels
equivalent or higher than traditional
standards. Instrument and
overall control system checkout time was
reduced by nearly half.
Less
scope means a lower
budget. A smaller budget and less scope means a
shorter schedule. A
shorter schedule means an earlier startup and
operation, which means you
are making money sooner. Contact us today
to learn how our
process
can bring you results.
|